RAW 106 Results

[Dominic Reynolds]

A very fair argument has been presented. I intend to discuss this with Ken and Blade, but essentially, I think if you write for the show then you shouldn't have to review

That's open to tweaks though....cause I'm Tired of only seeing JTB and Bret and pot and KO write reviews regularly...

[☆Demmi-Mae☆]

Well I would but u lot dont like it coz I dont do it like the others I cant, its hard for me to write about everything and do long ones I generally love the show either way and will write that it all looks lovely and I love it an u writers r fantastic but thats not good enough or constructed enough to count as one so meh -_- thats why I dont review plus maybe if u allowed reviews smaller then what they r then maybe more people would but meh I see we aint gonna get the ppv up very quickly so w/e imma jus sit here an wait :c

[☆Demmi-Mae☆]

But anyway good show loved all the matches especially mine maybe do with more coding to makr it pretty but it was a good read an congrats to all those who won, oh an btw all your rps were good too

[Christian Knight]

Demmi you can give a short review. It's not hard. I'll do one right now. That's only like one sentences for each match. You don't need a full paragraph if you don't want to put one.

Match 1- The writer who wrote this match need to pay attention to who roleplayed and who didn't and he could use some more announcer action in it.

Match 2 - The Match could use some Html and it could also do without the { or the } , those things look gay.

Match 3 - Match was a little short and again it could use a little html.

Match 4 - The writer could have implemented the introductions instead of going straight into ding ding ding, and could have could have used a little bit of html.

Match 5 - At least this match uses bold html and some italic, great way to end the show.


See not that hard, just one sentence each. Though in my criticism I only concentrated on the negative instead of the positive. If anyboud is wondering what about html though Let me show some examples..

Instead of

Phil Latio: Blah blah blah

Put like

Phil Latio: Blah blah blah.

stuff like that.

["British Brawler" Zak Shields]

Match 1 - Was nice quick read, would be nice for commantary like i always suggest.

Match 2 - Awesome! The ending was great and i loved the JTB commentary all the way through.

Match 3 - I wrote, i know i could have made it longer but im not keen on doing diva match's no disrespect to the divas im just rubbish at them.

Match 4 -So much fuel to the fire for both rivalries here. congrats to KO.

Match 5 - went how i saw it going to be honest lol.

All segments were well written and great for adding more heat to their rivalries

[Dominic Reynolds]

And there's three reviews

["British Brawler" Zak Shields]

see i told ya i would do it. was just either drinking or working lol

[Beno]

I would review but I have access to a laptop on the weekends. By the time i get the laptop, the three reviews are up. But if it is insisted, I'll type one up.

[Sheamus]

May 18, 2013 2:51:14 GMT -5 Christian Knight said:

Demmi you can give a short review. It's not hard. I'll do one right now. That's only like one sentences for each match. You don't need a full paragraph if you don't want to put one.

Match 1- The writer who wrote this match need to pay attention to who roleplayed and who didn't and he could use some more announcer action in it.

Match 2 - The Match could use some Html and it could also do without the { or the } , those things look gay.

Match 3 - Match was a little short and again it could use a little html.

Match 4 - The writer could have implemented the introductions instead of going straight into ding ding ding, and could have could have used a little bit of html.

Match 5 - At least this match uses bold html and some italic, great way to end the show.


See not that hard, just one sentence each. Though in my criticism I only concentrated on the negative instead of the positive. If anyboud is wondering what about html though Let me show some examples..

Instead of

Phil Latio: Blah blah blah

Put like

Phil Latio: Blah blah blah.

stuff like that.

Any good stuff in match four I should keep doing when I write matches?

[Christian Knight]

sorry for the brief summary. But to focus on the positive stuff for match 4 instead of the negative. Here is what i have to say.

I like on how in match 4 their was more humanized. Is that the word because i don't know the word for it.

Instead of just orton punch opponent, kick opponent, slam, near pinfall, ect ect, ect.. I like on how you described on how orton was meere inches away from the relief in pain, or on how or how you described on how he was trying to get closure and closure to his salvation as if to convey what the wrestler may be feeling instead of just the simple *Insert move, insert, move, counter, move, move, counter, near pin, repeat process* I also liked some of your wordplay, I particularly liked and never though of using the words "Hot pursuit" unless I'm chasing Austin Star or even guardrail instead of turnbuckle is a nice change up. I liked on how you played how the human body takes damage or what is the word how going threw a match effects a person such as the example of orton's vision going blurry.

I could have done a more in depth review of every match, but just wanted to show demmie, that it's not hard to do a review, even if it's short at least it's a review, that there is no reason to be lazy. Also for future reference in the sign up section you can find peoples entrances. No need to write them any more as I had a Create your own entrance kind of thing in the Thy Entrances that we can just copy and paste, and it also give the roleplayers a little bit more freedom when it comes to creating their own character. Not every one has a entrance but I created a generic one which I think I will modify to make it better.

[Sheamus]

Thank you Ken, appreciate it ^_^